[NewCandle] Putting "jerk" to work

[Jones Beene]

Nick & Keith ... (I am resisting the temptation to add "and 
assorted jerk-enthusiasts" or worse)

> Now maybe by applying some jerky principle ala Jones'
> suggestion and vibrating the plates or making them
> asymmetrical or something, you might get a real kick
> in voltage.


I hope you will try this. It seems to be worth an effort, and as 
K. implies there could be something to it). Either disks with 
built-in "wobble" or better yet, mount the old assembly on an 
ultrasonic transducer (especially one tuned to 22.5 kHz <g> )

Remember also Podkletnov - There was a thread a few months back on 
the subject of  "Electrogravity" following the ESA announcement. 
Jack Smith  supplied some old posts indicating that E.P. got the 
antigravity effect ONLY when there was "wobble" in his disk. I 
remember that  this was a direct quote from E.P. even though it 
was never  mentioned in the first few months following the 
announcement.

What this wobble could be telling us ...  is that the extra 
motion, caused by the imprecision of balance (poor 
craftsmanship), and at a unplanned vector away from the main 
vector in his work, but missing from many attempts at 
 replication - is providing so-called "jerk" - the higher order of 
acceleration - which could be a critical feature in that it is a 
power law step above either acceleration or deceleration of the 
disk - which also is said to produce a smaller effect.

E.P. apparently said that a constant velocity disk gave no 
results -only a change in velocity - which can be either 
acceleration of  better yet - jerk, where the effect is 
potentially squared.

Hey - OU or AG ... take your pick <g> There will be a free trip to 
Stockholm for success at either one.

Jones