[NewCandle] New evidence of giant gravitomagnetism

[Keith Nagel]

Hi Hamdi,

Glad you enjoyed that, Martin's work is quite good and
very thought provoking. 

I think his point about the different superconductors
was that only with the niobium was it possible to
get the effective mass increase in the cooper-pairs.
The HTSC's don't have this effective mass increase,
and so do not show the effect. Or more precisely,
all spinning masses undergoing accelleration/decelleration
will show the effect, but to a much lesser degree 
due to the low effective mass. This was always the
difficulty with Wallaces work, finding materials
which could be manipulated into showing enough
of an effect to be sensible.

Also, Martin does address Gene's work in other papers,
although he seems only to be familiar with the basic spinning
superconductor/shielding experiment. I personally see
no reason that both workers results can be valid
but Gene hasn't made the same effort as Martin to
explain what he is doing and why. To my mind, the
problem is just one of communication of results
and experimental methods. I do understand that
commercial considerations are hampering this communication
so perhaps the situation will remain as it is;
but I'd hate to see history pass Gene by. He
was the first, after all.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
[mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Hamdi Ucar
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 8:04 AM
To: New energy for the new world.
Subject: Re: [NewCandle] New evidence of giant gravitomagnetism


Keith,

Thank you for announcing this news!

Beside the theoretical solution offered on papers, the effect appers a
direct proof of unification of physics at low enery.

I think the induction of gravitomagnetic field by cooper-pairs by a special
condition is related to structure of the electron, which in turn, a
transformation of electro-magnetic field  still by unknown mechanism.
Therefore, I think gravitational field (of non-newtonian) is part of this 
unknown mechanism.
Reciprocally, gravitational force could be a result of transformation of
electromagnetic field to particle character. Classically, gravitational 
force is result of
the mass, but it is also possible the gravitational force is result of time 
derivation
of the enery, for instance the change of the direction of flowing enery, 
like reflection
of light from a mirror, the idea of Frank Znidarsic.

It appears that introduction of new terms into Maxwell's equations would 
allow
a solution for formation of electron and may of other particles and allow to 
generation
of non-newtonian gravitational forces externally, at instance, by formation 
of cooper-pairs.

On the phenomenical side, it is also interesting that not every 
superconductance state result
to gravitomagnetic fields, so formation of cooper-pairs appers not a 
sufficent condition for
the phenomenon.

I found older, another paper co-authored by M. Tajmal titled
"Hypothetical Gravity Control and Implications for Spacecraft Propulsion" 
submitted at 2002
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0207123.
Unexpectingly, paper try to demonstrate that "manipulation of gravity" would 
NOT lead to
a breaktrough in space propulsion.

Regards,
hamdi ucar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Nagel" <NewCandleAdmin at ipdiscover.com>
To: "New energy for the new world." <NewCandle at ipdiscover.com>
Sent: Friday, 24 March, 2006 21:09
Subject: [NewCandle] New evidence of giant gravitomagnetism


> Hi All,
>
> The mysterious "Ham" (grin) mentioned this on Vo. yesterday,
>
> http://www.physorg.com/news12054.html
>
> The researcher, Martin Tajmar, posits that the measured mass anomaly
> of cooper pairs in a superconductor is due to the generation
> of a gravitomagnetic field. To test this hypothesis he rotates
> a niobium superconductor and looks for g variation with accellerometers.
> He credits Henry Wallace with prior work ( I'm always glad to
> see fringe researchers get their due ) but for some strange
> reason neglects Podkletnov. I'm sure he's aware of that work,
> so this is a bit odd.
>
> A little searching pulled up quite a bit of background on Martin and
> his work, the most relevant stuff as follows.
>
> Here's Martins homepage.
>
> http://ilfb.tuwien.ac.at/~tajmar/
>
> Here's an interview with Martin in which he explains something about the
> experiment.
>
> http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/471/1/Martin-Tajmar-Interview-for-Broadband
>
> This most recent paper is about the actual experiment shown in the first
> link,
>
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0603033
>
> And these papers provide more info.
>
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0603032
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0602591
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0412176
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0408001
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0406761
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0406006
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0203033
> http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0012091
>
> More to follow.
>
> K.
>


_______________________________________________
NewCandle mailing list
NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com