[NewCandle] New evidence of giant gravitomagnetism

[Nick Reiter]

Good morning, los dudes

Good thread and topic to bounce around for a while! 
Notice I am smiling as I write this.  Usually, I get a
fiendish sour face when somebody brings up Arts Parts
bismuth-magnesium, but hey, y'all are just so much my
favorite gang of mad scientists, I have to remain
perky.

To refresh all, yes, I was one of the people who
examined a fragment of the so called Roswell metal
being promoted by Linda Howe back in the day.  The
text of my original report - minus the old SEM photos
which were long before I had a scanner - is reprinted
with annotations here:

http://www.theavalonfoundation.org/artsparts.htm

My opinion remains to this day that the metal fragment
was either a chunk of vacuum process residua or dross
from a lead refining process.  I favor the former. 
The magnesium was a good ringer for several casting
alloys.  Because of all that, and the highly
questionable way the metal was "discovered" and
promoted, I have to also wonder if it may have been an
intentionally made "artifact" intended for
disinformation.  I can strut out onto the limbs of
paranoia sometimes also.  But I don't believe it was
from a nucleon-gravity drive or UFO.

The damned un-dying/undead mythos generated from that
whole incident has been an endless source of
frustration as well as morbid fascination for these
past 10 years.  It is re-born with every newbie
discovering it for the first time.

Despite all dat, I do try to make lemonade from the
lemons and direct those seekers to Wallace's work,
which in my own opinion I find to be more interesting
than Podkletnov's or Ning Li's.  A few years back, I
was funded to attempt some scaled down replications of
E.P.s set up, using a 4 inch diameter ring.  Results
were quite negative.  The people I got the ring from
were the same folks in Columbus, Ohio as who made the
large ring for the NASA replication that failed as
well.  I had a good conversational rapport with JR
Gaines, of TMI/SCI.  A very eye-opening one too, as
far as learning some of the dirty underbelly of the
whole HTSC saga.

I continue to be excited about the new gravitomagnetic
field effect work, though.  Very much excited!  The
authors did an honorable thing in referencing
Podkletnov.  But I also share their (presumed)
perspective that even if Eugene P's effects were real,
they were not the same effect.

I never had enough of a chance to truly and honestly
work with Wallace's effects.  I experimented with some
copper gyroscopes and a bismuth one at speeds of about
6,000 rpm, but lacked the cojones to take them any
higher.  Didn't see much of anything, but I assume I
was way too far into the grass speed and mass wise.

Good to see some banter on ye olde Newe Candle!

nr

--- Keith Nagel <NewCandleAdmin at ipdiscover.com> wrote:

> Terry writes:
> >Yeah, but what everyone misses is that it's not the
> > electrons which play the part here . . . it's the
> exposed nucleons.
> >A synchronous march, aligned by the field, of high
> mass rotation.
> 
> I understand this is Ning Li's theory. Has there
> been anymore progress
> from her? I was lead to believe that the experiments
> petered out
> and she is back in China, although I could easily be
> mistaken.
> Did she get to the point of doing experiments to
> prove out the theory? 
> 
> >It all goes back to Art's Parts!  ;-)
> 
> Now you're just joking. You know, Nick actually
> tested that
> stuff; I'll defer to his opinion on the subject.
> 
> K.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
>
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com