[NewCandle] Graneau

[Jones Beene]

Keith,

I am in a position of being able to submit a proposal for funding, as 
well as a budget. There is a sense that money is becoming available, 
with few strings attached.

I totally agree that what is needed is to "get the ball farther down the 
field" and would like to include a number of suggestions for possible 
improvements, as well as more accurate testing.

My ultimate motive for becoming involved - is that a successful 
experiment - in addition to telling us whether or not H2O has a hidden 
source of energy - might be amenable to take to a higher level in 
another (similar) incarnation for use with HOOH instead of water and in 
the context of an automotive 'prime mover.'

Unfortunately for my particular agenda, I suspect that the funder will 
chose a University to do the Graneau replication work, and it will get 
bogged down in academic details - instead of cutting to the chase.

I have this ultimate vision for the future of automotive - in the age of 
$5 and up per gallon gasoline - of a very small turbine (single stage 
turbo-generator) being driven by an inexpensive liquid, produced on site 
(owner's garage) from off-peak electrical power.

This device can either power the car totally, or more likely - serve in 
a hybrid configuration to keep a smaller number of batteries charged.

Imagine the 'hot end' of the smallest turbocharger available, no 
compressor but instead a generator of about 15-20 kW output, with about 
half of that being recirculated back into the arc discharge.

The net difference of 7-10 kW is used to keep a battery pack topped-off 
so that a range of hundreds of miles is possible with maybe 100 kg of 
batteries.

I know, I know ----> dream on ...

Jones




> No, not offhand. I think it would be very easy to replicate
> the experiment as described, but I'm not sure that would be the best thing
> given that they didn't measure the kinetic energy
> in any direct way. To get the ball farther down the field
> one would want to make that measurement directly. That
> would require some creative work. 
> 
> I sort of agree with Graneaus negative hypothesis about thunder;
> I have experimentally observed that currents on the
> order graneau mentions can be passed silently though
> a water arc. The same currents can be passed with the
> terrific explosion Graneau observes. This work I did
> in '92 after reading Graneau & Graneau's book on
> electrodynamics. Channel heating is not the sole reason
> for the explosion, as he points out.
> 
> K.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
> [mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Jones Beene
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 5:14 PM
> To: New energy for the new world.
> Subject: [NewCandle] Graneau
> 
> 
> Hey Guys ---
> 
> Anyone know of a replication of the Graneau/Hull/Hathaway water arc 
> discharge?
> 
> ... or even a failed replication, etc.
> 
> 
> ....possible chance of getting a replication attempt funded
> 
> 
> Jones
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
> http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
> http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
>