[NewCandle] Graneau

[Keith Nagel]

Just to be clear, I studies water arc, and didn't
try to quantify the kinetic energy of the explosion.
What I did was to determine the things that make the
explosion happen, and how to control it. Part of
that was measuring the input energy precisely.

In answer to your first question, I have all my
old notes, and scope shots of the various experiments.
I also have all the important equipment from that time,
although I had access to a beautiful Lecroy 9450
that was more precise than my current tek scope.

I mentioned this work previously on Vo, not sure
if I mentioned it here...

As regards your second question, that's not something
I can answer for you. It's like asking me if God exists. 
Or if your lover is being true to you.
How can I possibly answer such a question?

Seriously, I'm being quite earnest here.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
[mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Jones Beene
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:39 PM
To: New energy for the new world.
Subject: Re: [NewCandle] Graneau


Keith

 > I did that work in '92 to
> satisfy my own curiousity about the nature of the water arc,
> and pretty well nailed down all the parameters that went into
> the phenomena. 

Did you write up anything? Do you think there is real OU there?

When I posted the message, I was not consciously aware that you had done 
this exact thing, although I know that arc discharges in general are one 
of your great interests.

Jones


The "channel heating" thing you mentioned" - is that related to the 
inverse capillary effect?

_______________________________________________
NewCandle mailing list
NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com