[NewCandle] Stiffler's Device

[Jones Beene]

Keith, Nick et al.,

Barium ferrite? Why would you think it was that?

Well - it was just a guess - which he later confirmed. 

In private mail, he was pretty "shocked" that  I could guess it so quickly, but I had been focusing recently on revivals of the Sweet VTA, on another forum - which - BION- with new information, there is a good argument for that device really being OU "at times".... (properly "conditioned" core)

Turns out, with the Stiffler circuit what he doesn't say is as importatn as what he does... and when any other comparably-wound ferrite core is used, the bulb will not even begin to lite up. This does not suggest real OU of course, but the following message sent to Fred today pretty much expresses my sentiment about the so-called radiant (wattless) energy.

Frederick Sparber wrote:

> If it wasn't for the cost I would use at least three VDGs for getting
> a multipole field configuration to see how it interacts with the 
> earth-ionosphere charges.

Fred, there is a most interesting convergence of ideas going-on here 
that might push your experiment "higher" so-to-speak, in anti-gravity terms.

I am referring to the three-way collection of postings over the weekend 
regarding "Energy Violations" and "Circuit cries Foul" and VDG/AG etc. 
Did you catch that there is this glaring overlap, once you tun into the 
details, in those threads with what you are doing?

Ultimately, I am suggesting the possibility of adding an Avramenko's 
Plug 'type' of Free Electron Pump to operate in tandem with a VDG:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep01.htm

The might allow the two operate with synergism, to wit:

Any motion of charge is electric current by definition, even if the 
motion is relatively minor compared to the potential. The electric 
potential field can move charge; especially in an AC or pulsed DC 
situation and this results in "free" work or energy, but of a strange 
sort, which I think that this is where the possible overlap between all 
of these recent threads on Vortex lies. It is (probably) enough to use 
the electrical field (scalar potential source) to create the power and 
work in an electric load circuit, which is then recycled back, with some 
added electrons drawn in from ambient. This could be autocatalytic.

But bordering on this is the semantic quandary: which Frolov/Bearden 
state something to the effect that there are both the "wattful" current 
and "wattless" current. Almost brings a smiley out, doesn't it. To 
create the so-called "free energy system," then, it is necessary to 
transform the wattless current to wattful current - but that might be 
only possible in an "in situ" situation, resulting in antigravity as the 
end product. Almost brings a bigger smiley out, doesn't it.

This kind of lingo: OU-speak - will turn many EEs (not Terry) to mush 
but nevertheless, this is the same kind of thing one hears regarding 
"cold electricity" and "Radiant energy" in other circles. The point 
being that there is a "special kind" of EMF available in nature, which 
is not exactly watt-denominated (so to speak). It is not exactly 
electrostatic either. This is the crux of the Tesla controversy.

I urge you to look into this possibility as an altenative (and cheaper 
way) instead of adding another VDG. Especially note that Naudin's 
version of the plug with an automotive ignition coil, or a lighter 
weight version, might operate kind of as an intermediary system, even 
though I suspect that the barium ferrite antennas of Dr. Stiffler are 
adding something special also, in the way of usable EMF. IOW you would 
not need to add more power, just kind of a "reverse VDG" - if you catch 
my drift.

But the bottom line is that so long as your gram-scale can accomodate 
the added weight, you might be able to combine many of these 
hypothetical ideas - although to be honest - the best approach to doing 
this is not clear.

Make sure that there is no one on you roof at the time you fire it up <g>.

Jones