[NewCandle] Stiffler's Device

[Jones Beene]

Keith,

Hey, I know, I know ... in the past I have been more skeptical and publicly so (which is a rarity for moi) than almost anyone about  Bearden & Co.  I think his greatest fault was in trying to shoehorn everything into his standard spiel - but OTOH that because of his circumstance as being the first spokesperson for "free energy" and his historical placemany in the field - that he was a magnet for some of the anomalous underlying experiments (done by others) which could have shown an anomaly.  Despite his ridiculous Maxwell-Heavyside spiel.

Here is an edited piece cut-and-pasted from a Tesla site. It demonstrates some of the semantic problems.

 I don't have an answer as to what is going on, but as of now, I am convinced that there is "something" about barium in HV situations. What though ?? .... that is the $64 question


 To attempt to understand "negative energy" two variations of normal scientific terms are used.

 

Hot Current: This is the normal form of EMF. 


Cold current: This might be a "time reversed" counterpart 
of normal hot current. 




Discussion of cold current: 

A device that time reverses an electromagnetic wave can be called 
'phase conjugate mirror,' but I'm not sure that helps. The concept is 
not new but it could be one key to 'free energy.' The 
mistake made by the academic establishment was to assume a constant increase in 
entropy is the inevitable result of all physical interactions in every time frame. This is only true 
so long as time flows forward. Time may stop "flowing" under certain circumstances - such as spatial dimensions below the Forster radius.



Is Entropy simply a process governed by local 
macroscopic time flow ?  Maybe.



OK so far I can buy into this. It meshes in well with the Dirac notion of "reciprocal space" so long as we assume that this mathematical construct: reciprocal space is normal 3-space with time reversed. But how do you "reverse time" ? And can it be reversed in little segments interspersed along with the normal arrow of time, so that you seem to have no time distortion at the macro level?


Here is an historical (hysterical <g>) attempt to answer this going back to the original "Mr T"  hissef:

Executive summary  (of a sort) --     shockwave = temporary time reversal


By 1890, after a period of intense experimentation and design development, 
  Tesla summarized the components necessary for the practical deployment of a 
  radiant electrical power distribution system. Tesla had already discovered the 
  wonderful fact that impulse durations of 100 microseconds or less could not be 
  sensed and would do no physiological harm. He planned to use these in his 
  power broadcast. Furthermore, shocking waves of 100 microsecond duration 
  passed through all matter, a fitting form of electrical energy to broadcast 
  throughout the stone, steel, and glass of a power-needy city. Tesla would not 
  expect distortions with specially adjusted energy fields, vectors which 
  permeated matter without interactive effects.

 
  
Tesla made a most startling discovery the same year, when placing a long 
  single-turn copper helix near his magnetic disrupter. The coil, some two feet 
  in length, did not behave as did solid copper pipes and other objects. The 
  thin walled coil became ensheathed in an envelope of white sparks. Undulating 
  from the crown of this coil were very long and fluidic silvery white 
  streamers, soft discharges which appeared to have been considerably raised in 
  voltage. These effects were greatly intensified when the helical coil was 
  placed within the disrupter wire circle. Inside this "shockzone", the helical 
  coil was surrounded in a blast which hugged into its surface, and rode up the 
  coil to its open end. It seemed as though the shockwave actually pulled away 
  from surrounding space to cling to the coil surface, a strange attractive 
  preference. The shockwave flowed over the coil at right angles to the 
  windings, an unbelievable effect. The sheer length of discharges leaping from 
  the helix crown was incomprehensible. With the disrupter discharge jumping I 
  inch in its magnetic housing, the white shimmering discharges rose from the 
  helix to a measured length of over two feet. This discharge equaled the very 
  length of the coil itself'. It was an unexpected and unheard 
  transformation.



  Here was an action more nearly "electrostatic" in nature, although he knew 
  that academes would not comprehend this term when used in this situation. 
  Electrostatic energy did not fluctuate as did his shockwaves. The explosive 
  shockwave had characteristics unlike any other electrical machine in 
  existence. Yet Tesla stated that the shockwave, during the brief instant in 
  which it made its explosive appearance, more nearly resembled an electrostatic 
  field than any other known electrical manifestation. just as in electrostatic 
  friction machines, where current and magnetism are negligible, a very 
  energetic field component fills space in radiating lines. This 'dielectric" 
  field normally launches through space in a slow growth as charges are 
  gathered. Here was a case where a DC generator provided the high voltage. This 
  voltage charged an insulated hoop of copper, growing to its maximum value. If 
  all values in the circuit were properly balanced, in the manner prescribed by 
  Tesla, a sudden charge collapse would then occur. This collapse was 
  necessarily very much shorter than the interval required to charge the hoop. 
  The collapse comes when the magnetic disrupter extinguishes the arc. If the 
  circuit is properly structured, no backrush alternations ever occur.

 
  
This unidirectional succession of charge-discharge impulses causes a very 
  strange field to expand outward, one which vaguely resembles a "Stuttering' or 
  'staccato" electrostatic field. But these terms did not satisfactorily 
  describe the conditions actually measured around the apparatus, a powerful 
  radiant effect exceeding all expectable electrostatic values. Actual 
  calculation of these discharge ratios proved impossible. Implementing the 
  standard magneto-inductive transformer rule, Tesla was unable to account for 
  the enormous voltage multiplication effect. Conventional relationships 
  failing, Tesla hypothesized that the effect was due entirely to radiant 
  transformation rules, obviously requiring empirical determination. Subsequent 
  measurements of discharge lengths and helix attributes provided the necessary 
  new mathematical relationship.

 
  
He had discovered a new induction law, one where radiant shockwaves 
  actually auto-intensified when encountering segmented objects. The 
  segmentation was the key to releasing the action. Radiant shockwaves 
  encountered an helix and "flashed over" the outer skin, from end to end. This 
  shockwave did not pass through the windings of the coil at all, treating the 
  coil surface as an aerodynamic plane. The shockwave pulse auto-intensified 
  exactly as gas pressures continually increase when passing through Venturi 
  tubes. A consistent increase in electrical pressure was measured along the 
  coil surface. Indeed, Tesla stated that voltages could often be increased at 
  an amazing 10,000 volts per inch of axial coil surface. This meant that a 24 
  inch coil could absorb radiant shockwaves which initially measured 10,000 
  volts, with a subsequent maximum rise to 240,000 volts! Such transformations 
  of voltage were unheard with apparatus of this volume and simplicity. Tesla 
  further discovered that the output voltages were mathematically related to the 
  resistance of turns in the helix. Higher resistance meant higher voltage 
  maxima.



  He began referring to his disrupter line as his special "primary", and to 
  the helical coil placed within the shockzone, as his special "secondary". But 
  he never intended anyone to equate these terms with those referring to 
  magnetoelectric transformers. This discovery was indeed completely different 
  from magneto-induction. There was a real and measurable reason why he could 
  make this outlandish statement. There was an attribute which completely 
  baffled Tesla for a time. Tesla measured a zero current condition in these 
  long copper secondary coils. He determined that the current which should have 
  appeared was completely absent. Pure voltage was rising with each inch of coil 
  surface. Tesla constantly referred to his "electrostatic induction laws", a 
  principle which few comprehended. Tesla called the combined disrupter and 
  secondary helix a 'Transformer".

 
  
Tesla Transformers are not magnetoelectric devices, they use radiant 
  shockwaves, and produce pure voltage without current. No university High 
  Frequency Coil must ever be called a "Tesla Coil", since the devices usually 
  employed in demonstration halls are the direct result of apparatus perfected 
  by Sir Oliver Lodge and not by Nikola Tesla. The Tesla Transformer is an 
  impulse apparatus, and cannot be as easily constructed except by strict 
  conformity with parameters which Tesla enunciated. Tesla Transformers produce 
  extraordinary white impulse discharges of extreme length and pressure, which 
  exceed the alternating violet spark displays of Lodge Coils. This is 
  illustrated by noting the manner in which Tesla Transformers are actually 
  constructed. While looking and seeming the same, each system actually performs 
  very different functions. Lodge Coils are alternators. Tesla Transformers are 
  unidirectional impulses. The most efficient Tesla Transformations were 
  obtained only when the disruptive radiating wire line equaled the mass of the 
  helical coil.


More later (or shall I dispense with MrT ?)