[NewCandle] Constrained hydrolysis

[Keith Nagel]

I'll have to find the article, I may well
be suffering from poor recollection and
the experiment was somehow different.
If there _was_ a charged species in the
flame a magnet ought to split it right out.
But I've never tried directing an H2 flame
at a magnet, and you have and got negative
results, so now I am wondering about my sanity...

K.


-----Original Message-----
From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
[mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Nick Reiter
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:46 AM
To: New energy for the new world.
Subject: Re: [NewCandle] Constrained hydrolysis


Ahhhhhhh... I dunno about the monoatomic H in the
flame.  Apart from Langmuir's torch, and some of the
B-G claims, I was always under the impression that it
remained H2 unless you REALLY wacked it (energy wise)
to split it.  Now the oxygen, I'm not sure of - you
might have O2 and O in some ratio.

I had tried moving a hydrogen torch flame around with
a strong (although not Captain Bob strong!) magnet,
and never saw much.

NNNN



--- Keith Nagel <NewCandleAdmin at ipdiscover.com> wrote:

> BTW Jones, isn't the H2 neutral and not affected by
> B field, axial or otherwise? In the flame, you've
> got
> atomic H which is charged. And as Nick alluded to,
> it's possible to manipulate the electrolytic ion
> streams
> with a magnet. You can see this as pH changes with a
> soluble
> indicator in a properly constructed electrolysis
> cell.
> 
> K.
> 
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile.  Get started!
http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail

_______________________________________________
NewCandle mailing list
NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com