[NewCandle] Structured running water?

[Keith Nagel]

>Yeah, that is the one where he gets less gas for the same input. I spent 
>a couple of hours watching all his clips but did not care to waste 
>anymore time on it. He has a mini-industry going...

No doubt. All the website links hit a buy page, that made me chuckle.
I wonder if he's sold anything? Clearly that's the intent of
the promotional work. I'm not seeing the science here...

>The encouraging thing to me now - is that so many people are working on 
>efficient electrolysis - if there is any way to greatly surpass Faradaic 
>limitations, someone will eventually trip over it by accident - and it 
>could be some technique which is as simple as a mechanical pretreatment 
>- like a kind of water "restructuring" - perhaps running the water 
>through capillary tubes for just a few seconds, who knows?

When I was doing this kind of work, I was focused on anodic
and cathodic current density efficiency. That's where the action
is, IMHO. A cheap catalyst to match platinum would put
the ball a lot farther down the field. 

>If only there were more hours in a day, and/or I could shed about twenty 
>years of age-problems and infirmity ... well, at least I would like to 
>have the energy level I had in the eighties, combined with what I know 
>now (at least when I can remember it ;-)

Yeah, it's a funny thing, motivation. I'd like to say the same,
but I fear that my problems are more psychological than physical.
That is, I find it harder to get motivated the more I
learn about how the world actually works. I rather suspect
that the problem is not finding a technical solution, but
selling it. I mean that in all senses of the word. It's
not enough to have a functioning device. That's
kind of scary when you think about it.

K.