[NewCandle] SEC: was Outdoor H2 bucket

[Nick Reiter]

Well, great googly moogly, I am always game for such
madness!

Whither does one go to get the latest updates by
Stiffler?  Or is he still formally off the radar?

Back in about 1994, I built several versions of the
Seike transistor ring oscillator, and tried to discern
any real weight losses there.  I think it was mostly
thermal convective from the resistors and 2N3055s, but
was never 100% certain.

In general terms, what is the latest version of
Stiffler's system?  You mention a battery - is he now
dispensed totally with the signal generator and
grounds?

Thanks for the updates!

N

--- Jones Beene <jonesb9 at pacbell.net> wrote:

> Nick
> 
> > Damn, I wish someone would come along with a big
> new
> > weird in antigravity.  I scan the lists and sites
> > sometimes, even as I recount possible loopholes I
> > missed in my own past...and generally negative
> > result...experiments!
> 
> Funny you should mention that Nick. There is a
> tantalizing bit of 
> evidence that the Stiffler LED circuit, now called
> the SEC, does lose a 
> tiny amount of weight when turned on.
> 
> That would explain why certain UFOs are said to have
> a strange glow ;-)
> 
> Riiiight... Anyway, this is premature, and a
> shielded milligram scale is 
> needed, and even then is not clear cut. Hey Keith,
> got a "joule thief" 
> circuit handy? Weigh the thing off and on and see
> what you get.
> 
> As everyone can guess, RF can do very screwy things
> to digital scales. 
> Stay tuned. On Hartmann's German site, they are
> coming up with weird 
> versions, using neons as well as LEDs and a few of
> them can now have a 
> resistor put into the "plug" for measuring current -
> which "seems" to 
> show slight OU.
> 
> Better results, if you believe that apparent
> brightness in light output 
> is indicative of cohered power, can be obtained when
> the resistor is 
> removed and the maximum amount of LEDs powered in
> the 1 watt range.
> 
> It is possible to power ~200 LEDs to full brightness
> with one watt DC 
> from a 9 v. battery, converted to RF by an onboard
> oscillator. Fully 
> floating.
> 
> If powered by DC, the manufacturer's specs for these
> ultra-brites, 
> indicate that 20 of them will require one watt DC (3
> v), so the 
> advantage of RF as a power source is about 10-1, but
> that in itself 
> doesn't mean much towards proof of putative OU. It
> would mean that they 
> should be pushing 99% efficiency however. If every
> light in the country 
> were this efficient it would make a huge difference
> in lowering CO2 etc.
> 
> ... and to ask the obvious question - when will the
> LED manufacturers 
> jump into the fray, supply the RF circuit and then
> try to claim they 
> knew this all along...?
> 
> Maybe Stiffler should have tried for a patent after
> all ?
> 
> Jones
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
>
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/