[NewCandle] Cold Electricty

[Jones Beene]

--- Keith wrote:

Excellent suggestion. 

In fact at the top of my list of unanswered questions
is "diurnal variation"

Jones



> Hey Jones,
> 
> I have a suggestion for Ron. It's easy, and he
> doesn't
> have to do a thing to the circuit other than lose a
> little
> sleep. I think we can all agree that independent of
> our theories of operation, this test will provide
> valuable
> data.
> 
> Start the device, and let it run. Compare the output
> at
> 1pm to the output at 1am. LED's just as bright?
> 
> K.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
> [mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf
> Of Jones Beene
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 1:44 PM
> To: New energy for the new world.
> Subject: Re: [NewCandle] Cold Electricty
> 
> 
> 
> --- Keith,
> 
> > I was suggesting it be done, I wasn't about to do
> > it. You know, I do take this IP stuff seriously.
> > Seriously. (grin).
> 
> OK how about this - anyone who is definitely going
> to
> build the circuit, contact me first for the address
> and I will clear it with Ron. He just does not want
> the hassle of another attack.
> 
> BTW the "joule thief" thing is a great find, but if
> it
> represents the limits of how far you can take
> resonant-rise, then you still need .3 v or so of
> potential from somewhere, correct? Can you get that
> from ground on a consistent basis?
> 
> Jones
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
>
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NewCandle mailing list
> NewCandle at ipdiscover.com
>
http://ipdiscover.com/mailman/listinfo/newcandle_ipdiscover.com
>