[NewCandle] Resonance and Circulation: an introduction

[Keith Nagel]

Hi Fred,

Heh, George Holtz made something of a similar comment when I talked to him
about this idea last year. I too think that a carefully constructed set of analogies
to the macroscopic phenomena can produce a much better "Bohr" type model
of the atom. However, spin is one of those things that is terribly difficult to nail
down to a classical analog. While I couldn't find the link I wanted with animations
that show why spin is so difficult to model, I did find this terrific article about
Stern and Gerlach and the real nature of scientific discovery and experimental
research. All new ideas seem crazy, and an essential ingredient in being
a successful experimental researcher is to be willing to try things sometimes
that are in fact kind of crazy. As in the case of Stern and Gerlach, the theory
at the time was wrong, yet the experiment worked... something to think about.

K.


-----Original Message-----
From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com [mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Frederick Sparber
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 1:15 AM
To: newcandle at ipdiscover.com
Subject: [NewCandle] Resonance and Circulation: an introduction


Congratulastions Keith, you just described particle Spin.

2(pi)R = 1/2 hbar or R = kQ^2/Energy For Phase Velocity 137*c.

For the classical electron or it's charge-spin conjugate the positron 2(pi)R or Compton Lambda = h/mc =2.427E-12 meters.

Energy-Mass trapped in space due to a slight difference in the vacuum impedance (377 ohms) = (L/C)^1/2
exhibit inertial Energy-Mass in discrete resonant states

Fred